Dealing, Personally with the Cognitive Distributed Disruption of Attention Crisis
How to try to think in an age that won’t let you think: triage or drown as you survive—or don’t—the cognitive DDOS, or rather CDDAS, of the information age. For when everyone can publish, the scarce resource isn’t words or ideas or arguments—it’s your ability to focus and think straight. Therefore I propose a ruthless, humane guide to protecting Deep Thining from the system’s endless scroll…
Let me make this clear, No individual is trying to do this to me. No group has decided to overwhelm me with a flood of interesting and important things to read that disrupts my ability to actually maintain and follow substantive trains of thought. No broad conspiracy is attempting to inflict a CDDA attack—a Cognitive Distributed Disruption of Attention attack—on me.
The “system” is doing it.
But this is a severe crisis
Therefore. Steps must be taken:
Back up: There is now a flood of things from trusted, or at least interesting, smart people trying their very best, or if they are not trying their very best what they say is interesting in the sene of why this particular tissue of lies and misrepresentations and self-deceptions. So how the hell am I supposed to figure out how to handle all of these things that I should read but cannot physically read all of in a constructive, informative, and helpful way?
This is a structural problem of the information age. When the marginal cost of publishing fell toward zero, the binding constraint shifted from production to attention. What you are confronting is not “too much to read.” It is a regime in which the volume of plausible, credentialed, rhetorically sophisticated output exceeds the cognitive bandwidth of any serious person.
The question is not “How do I read it all?”
The question is: How do I build a decision architecture that extracts signal, detects distortion, and compounds insight over time?
So what is needed is a structured system—think of it as intellectual portfolio management, which requires ruthless triage as its first layer.
Therefore:
First, Create the Working Triage System: Every incoming piece into one of four bins.
Structural Signal (Read Closely): Arguments that: change your model of the world, signal élite coordination. reveal shifts in coalitions’ structures, or provide new empirical data and reinforce empirically grounded arguments. For these: read carefully, annotate, archive.
Elite Positioning (Read Strategically): Pieces that: reveal what smart people want to believe (or what they want you to believe, show how narratives are being framed, or indicate ideological consolidation. DO NOT READ FOR TRUTH!!!! Instead, skim to map incentives. Extract framing moves. Move on.
Noise with Diagnostic Value (Sample Lightly): These are the “tissueS of lies and misrepresentations and self-deceptions. They are useful as: cultural thermometers, psychological evidence, or coalition messaging tests. But you only need to read 10%. So: drop 90% without reading, and skim a randomly selected 10% until you identify the pattern. Then FULL STOP.
Irrelevant Volume (Do Not Touch): If it does not change your model or reveal structure, it is deadweight. Ruthlessly drop it. Even smart people spend a lot of their energy being an uninformative part of some amen chorus.
Then:
Build a 5-Level Engagement Ladder: When something arrives: (1) ignore, (2) skim, (3) annotate privately, (4) write a short note to yourself, (5) publish a response. Most items should die at level 1 or 2. Very few deserve 5.
Manage Your Information Portfolio: You are allocating scarce capital (attention) across uncertain projects (texts). So: 70% of your reading should deepen existing frameworks, 20% should explore adjacent domains, and 10% should probe wild cards. DO NOT INVERT THIS RATIO!!!!
Move from “Reading” to “Model Updating”: Instead of asking “should I read this?” ask instead “what specific parameter of my Visualization of the Cosmic All might this update?” If none, skip. If yes, define in advance what you are looking for: evidence? argument structure? coalition signal? Empirical data. Reading with a parameter target. Then FULL STOP.
Schedule “Deep Model Days”: Designate specific times for intake, separate intake from synthesis, and separate synthesis from publication. Start a weekly model-update memo to yourself, for compounding requires reflection time.
MAINTAIN A DO NOT RISE TO THE BAIT!!!! List: Many smart people write things that are: wrong, frustrating, provocative, and yet not worth engaging. Create a private list of “arguments I will not respond to” to preserve cognitive serenity and public leverage.
If I start to ruthlessly follow this program with my incoming information stream, I may be able to recover the time I need to do Deep Reading and Deep Analysis. But as it is—things do not look good.