NOTE TO SELF: TrumpChaos in a BREXIT Mirror

Is the best analogy to the chaos-monkey international trade politics Trump has embarked upon the example of BREXIT? And, if so, what does that tell us?...

Share


BREXIT was chaos and disruption—pointless chaos and disruption—to the United Kingdom’s integration into the European and through that the global economy. A tariff hit, but also a red-tape hit, and a chaos hit.

As I understand it, credible estimates of the BREXIT hit to the UK economy are:

  • The Centre for European Reform says 5.5% of GDP…

  • Bloomberg Economics says 4% of GDP…

  • Cambridge Econometrics projects a long-run 10.1% of GDP…

  • The Office for Budget Responsibility says 4% of GDP…

And, eyeballing, it is very hard to make a case that those numbers are an underestimate:

Share Brad DeLong's Grasping Reality

Trump’s international economic policy is also pointless disruption—chaos-monkey policy. Yes, the United States’s economy is (marginally) less integrated with the economies of its trading partners. But the divergences in relative factor prices vis-à-vis its major trading partners than vis-à-vis the United Kingdom’s tell us that it is highly likely that the surplus per unit of integration is greater.

So will the net damaging effect of ChaosTrump on the United States economy be greater of less than the effect of BREXIT on the United Kingdom economy?

Anybody with good ideas about how to assess:

  • The actual effect of BREXIT on the UK…

  • The relative international-economic integration levels of the US & UK…

  • The relative surplus per unit of integration of the US & UK…

  • The likely magnitude of TrumpChaos vs. BREXIT…

Please chime in. I really need to get a handle on this. I am supposed to be a trained professional. And yet I do not have a handle on this right now.

Give a gift subscription


References:

Leave a comment

Subscribe now

If reading this gets you Value Above Replacement, then become a free subscriber to this newsletter. And forward it! And if your VAR from this newsletter is in the three digits or more each year, please become a paid subscriber! I am trying to make you readers—and myself—smarter. Please tell me if I succeed, or how I fail…